Training, consultancy and resources to improve teaching and learning
You are here > Members' Resources > Thinking Classroom Resources > Resource Detail
Navigation Find Resources
Navigation Resource Search
Navigation Resource Tags
Active Learning   Adjectives   Advance Organiser   AfL   Ambition   Analogy   Analysis   Andragogy   Architecture   Archive   Art   Assemblies   Assessment   Association   Astronomy   Audience   Audio   Audit   Autonomy   Behaviour   Big Data   Bloom's Taxonomy   Book   Boys   Brain   Brain Break   Brain-Based Learning   British Values   Bullying   Capacity   Careers   Challenge   Change   Characteristics   Charlotte Mason   Childhood   Christmas   Cities   Classroom Management   Coach   Coaching   Collaboration   Colour   Comedy   Communication   Community   Comparison   Composition   Computers   Conflict   Connections   Constructivism   Contemplation   Conversation   Cooperation   Counting   CPD   Creative Curriculum   Creative Thinking   Critical Thinking   Curiosity   Currciulum   Curriculum   Danger   Daniel Pink   Data   Debate   Decision Making   Design   Differences   Differentiation   Digital   Discussion   Display   Diversity   Doodling   Dragon   Dream   Drive   Dunblane   Dweck   Dyslexia   Early Years   Easter   Economics   Edit   EEF   Effective Practice   Effort   Emotional Intelligence   Empathy   Enquiry   Environment   Equality   Error   Esteem   Evaluation   Evidence   Existential   Exploration   Facts   Failure   Feedback   Film   Fitness   Flow   Freedom   Froebel   G&T   Games   Gardner   Gender   Gender Neutral   Genius Hour   Genres   Geography   Gifted Able & Talented   Glass Bead Game   Global   Goals   Grammar   Grit   Group Work   Growth Mindset   Gun Control   Happiness   Hard Work   Hattie   Health   Heterarchy   Hierarchy   High Order Thinking   History   Holiday   Home Education   Home Schooling   Homework   Horace Mann   Humour   ICT   Imagination   Inclusion   Independent Learning   India   Induction   Influence   Infographic   Innovation   Inspection   Inspiration   Integrative   Intelligence   Internet   Interview Preparation   Intuition   Investigation   iPad   Jerome Bruner   John Dewey   Judgement   Juggling   Justification   Knowledge   Language   Leadership   Learning   Learning Community   Learning Skills   Learning Styles   Lecture   Lesson Design   Lesson Starters   LGBT+   Listening   Literacy   Literature   Logic   London 2012   Lord of the Flies   MAGT   Mark Making   Marketing   Marking   Marzano   Mastery   MAT   Mathematics   Media   Mediation   Memory   Mentoring   Metacognition   Metaphor   Metzinger   MFL   Mindset   Mistake   Modal Verbs   Morality   Motif   Motivation   Multiple Intelligences   Music   Myth   Nature   Negotiation   Networks   New Year   Noise   Nuclear Power   Numeracy   Ofsted   Olympics   ONR   Opinion   Order   Organisation   Outstanding   P4C   Pace   Parents   Patchwork Thinking   Pattern   Pedagogy   Periodic Table   Personal Development   Personalised Learning   Perspective   Philosophy   Pixar   Planets   Planning   Plastic   Play   Plenary   Plot   Poetry   Politics   Positive Education   Positive Error Culture   Poster   Poverty   Praise   Prediction   Prioritising   Problem Based Learning   Problem Solving   Process   Productivity   Professional Development   Professional Learning   Progress   Protection   PSHE   Psychology   Punctuation   Pupil Voice   Purpose   QCI   Quality   Questioning   Questionnaire   Ranking   RE   Reading   Real Time Coaching   Reasoning   Reflection   Reform   Reframing   Relationships   Religion   Research   Resilience   Responsibilities   Revision   Rights   Risk   Roles   Romans   Rules   Sacrifice   Safety   Scaffolding   School Improvement   Science   Seasons   Secondary School   Self Knowledge   Selling   SEN   Sequencing   Service   Setback   Shape   Shooting   Silence   Similarities   Simile   Skills   Snow Angels   Socrates   Sorting   Space   SPAG   Speaking & Listening   Spellings   Sports   Story   Stress   Struggle   Study   Subordinate Clause   Success   Success Criteria   Summarising   Summer   Surprise   Sustainability   Targets   Teaching   Team Work   Technology   Template   Thinking   Thinking Classroom   Thinking Cubes/Dice   Thinking Skills   Thinking Stories   Timbre   Time Management   Tone   Transition   Trust   Tudors   Understanding   UNESCO   Vacation   Values   Video   Visual Learning   Visual Story   Visual Thinking   War   Weather   Well-Being   Welsh   Winter   Wish   Word Game   Work   World War 1   World War 2   Writing   Year 6   Year 7   Zen  

The Value of Inspection

The Value of Inspection An Article comparing regulation of the nuclear industry with inspection of schools. Which comes out best?

This is a Free Sample Resource
Categories: Article, Teaching & Learning, Educators

Tags: Inspection Ofsted Nuclear Power ONR

The Problem is Getting Better

On 26th April 1986 at 01:23, during an experimental safety test, reactor four of the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant suffered a calamitous power increase. This caused explosions that distributed large quantities of radioactivity into the atmosphere. 2 days later the Russian 9 o’clock news presented a 20-second announcement,

There has been an accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. One of the nuclear reactors was damaged. The effects of the accident are being remedied. Assistance has been provided for any affected people. An investigative commission has been set up.

Over the following week, even when Swedish and other European radiation detectors began spiking, the Kremlin refused to offer any detail other than, ‘the problem is getting better but unfortunately it is not over yet’.

It's a Fix Up

I make everybody fix up like Ofsted, from I Call The Shots, Wiley.

Why, when you've perpetrated the biggest domestic nuclear incident in history would you mislead, misinform or withhold vital information from your neighbours? And why do some schools, hospitals, businesses and individuals go to extreme lengths to avoid being seen to fail? Here's a premiss:

If the system you work in is predicated on a model of motivation where success is rewarded and failure punished then you will, naturally, want to avoid failure. And if, heaven forbid, you do fail you might be tempted to shift the blame or mitigate the seriousness of the event so you avoid any penalty.

But when the authorities discover that people are not only failing but lying about it, then the rules will be tightened. Inspection will become more rigorous and unannounced; performance standards will be ratcheted up and more severe punishment dished out for those who fail and are found out. The drive to succeed may cause better temporary performance but this kind of system is founded on fear and avoidance of blame rather than purpose, autonomy and mastery - the three factors that comprise genuine human motivation.

Healthy Regulation; Meaningful Inspection

Swiftly following the Chernobyl disaster the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) drafted The Convention on Early Notification of a Nuclear Accident. Any signatory to the treaty agrees that if a nuclear accident occurs within its territory, that could realistically affect another state, it will promptly inform the IAEA and places likely to be affected. As of 2017, North Korea and the Holy See are among a handful of states yet to engage with the treaty.

So, how is the UK nuclear industry regulated and what can the UK education system learn from it?

The Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) independently inspects and regulates the safety and security of the UK's 37 nuclear sites. It is accountable to the public, the industry and government and takes a collaborative approach to maintaining and improving safety. It inspects and then works with those it's inspected to influence and enforce within a culture of continuous improvement.

Worst case scenarios in the nuclear industry are pretty bad but the ONR aims for an open, positive-error culture where surprises, mistakes and challenges can be addressed quickly and where everyone can become safer, faster. Why hide Sellafield's challenges from Hinkley point? Or Sizewell's learning and successes from Dounreay?

The ONR looks for industry engagement through partnership that includes:

  • independence from government.
  • the operator has absolute responsibility for safety.
  • proportionate regulation and enforcement/sanction.
  • open and honest interactions and communication.
  • collaborative improvement.
  • peer checking.
  • self-assessment.
  • training accreditation.
  • internal oversight.
  • external peer review by a strong independent external regulator.
  • international peer review (not regulation).
  • rigorous internal assurance process.

But in addition, every nuclear utility and installation within the power industry worldwide is subject to periodic and intense peer review. This has a huge positive effect in driving up standards in all areas and has built a culture of trust between the facility operators and the regulators.

Reviews are conducted by peers who are current practitioners in their field and reviews come with the following benefits:

  • Real credibility.
  • A chance to share culture and best practice between utilities
  • A reciprocal arrangement because the assessed location gains the experience from the reviewers but the reviewers gain experience from both the process and the location they are reviewing.
  • It is assessed against a common standard.
  • The location is left with a `prioritised` (vitally important) set of suggested actions that industry experts know from their own vast experience will improve performance.
  • It’s a great development opportunity for our staff, both technically and culturally.
  • It’s an approach that has been proven to work, time and again!

The Nuclear Industry vs Education

So, does OFSTED look to engage with schools through partnership that includes:

  • independence from government. NO
  • the school has absolute responsibility for standards. YES
  • proportionate regulation and enforcement/sanction. NO - one size fits all.
  • open and honest interactions and communication. YES
  • collaborative improvement. NO
  • peer review. NO
  • self-assessment. YES
  • training accreditation. YES
  • internal oversight. YES
  • external peer review by a strong independent external regulator. NO
  • international peer review (not regulation). NO
  • rigorous internal assurance process. NO
  • a culture of trust. NO

So, may I ask you to ponder how your experience of your profession would be different if those tasked with inspecting you were:

  • independent from government
  • were themselves peer-reviewed by another inspection organisation, ONR for example
  • were peer-reviewed by an international educational body
  • expecting you to take part in rigorous peer review with current practitioners
  • operated in a culture of trust

Oh, by the way, if you do want to move forward in this way, two things you can do:

  1. Join Challenge Partners
  2. Share this article as widely as you can.

Related Resources:

Ofsted and Outstanding


There are no Comments

Please Login to Comment