Intelligence: Who has it? Who hasn't? Is it fixed from birth? What’s it for? What is it? Where is it? Can it change?
Scientists argue about the definition of intelligence and everyone takes a view on what it is:
- The ability to make decisions and judgments that create positive effects - Graham
- Knowing there's always more to learn - Jodie
- Thinking, " I can..." - MJ, Westhoughton.
- Being able to deal with the unexpected - Andy
- Making connections - Janice Young
There are consequences of our different definitions of intelligence:
IQ : Let’s say you believe that IQ is the best way to define and measure intelligence. Consequences:
- You have to get over a certain score in an IQ test to be clever
- You have to be good at verbal and non-verbal reasoning to get a high score
- If your strengths are in other areas, you are not intelligent
Carol Dweck: (Mindsets and Self-Theory) Let’s say you think that intelligence is related to self-belief. Consequences:
- Some people believe they can become cleverer and are therefore positive/active about learning and growth
- Some people believe they’re stuck with their lot and are therefore negative/passive about learning and growth


(MI Head, MI Esteem Wall and MI Learning Board)
Howard Gardner: (Multiple Intelligences) Let’s say that intelligence is the ability to solve problems and create things that are of value to your society. Consequences:
- Everyone is clever because of what they do well
- Verbal and non-verbal reasoning is valued
- Running a meeting is valued
- Fixing things is valued
- Creating a piece of art is valued
- Managing your emotions is valued
- Running a family home is valued
- People are valued for what they do best